This week, I would like to address a topic close to my heart: access to education. I remember I asked my father, when I was a child, how I could afford to study given our economic circumstances.
A few days ago, I came across an article in The Guardian. Long story short, the UK government is preparing to implement a limit on university courses in England that are considered low-value.
This move will likely affect applicants from working-class and minority ethnic backgrounds. Under the new regulations, courses that do not lead to high numbers of graduates securing professional jobs, pursuing postgraduate studies, or starting businesses, will be restricted.
University vice-chancellors argue that these measures will deter students from pursuing capped courses, as they fear it will negatively impact their prospects.
“This will effectively act as a red flag to students. Who wants to apply to a ‘low value’ course?”
(A Vice-Chancellor)
Critics, on their end, contend that these measures effectively penalize universities and courses with a high proportion of working-class students, who often have limited financial resources and less familial support, thereby increasing the likelihood of dropout rates.
Nonetheless, it is unsurprising when considering that the proponents of such measures have openly acknowledged their lack of friendships among lower social classes. In other words, without first-hand experience, it becomes challenging to comprehend the realities faced by individuals from disadvantaged backgrounds.
I personally believe that imposing caps on ambition perpetuates the social barriers that have long hindered individuals from disadvantaged backgrounds.
By doing so they deny them the opportunity to demonstrate their worth, defy expectations, and contribute their unique perspectives to the world. I think ambition transcends boundaries and has to.
Oliver* 